麻豆传媒

Wildfire-Driven Deforestation Rates in California Among Highest in World

Reforestation Efforts Fall Far Behind Rate of Loss

News
View from rocky slope over pine forests to a blue Lake Tahoe and distant peaks
In 2007, the Angora Fire burned through this landscape overlooking Lake Tahoe. Taken in 2022, this image and researcher surveys show that, even 19 years later, most of the burned area continues to support very few or no tree seedlings. (Hugh Safford/麻豆传媒)

California has one of the highest rates of wildfire-driven deforestation in the world, and the trend has accelerated over the past three decades, according to a study from the University of California, Davis. 

in the journal Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, assessed the state鈥檚 wildfire-driven deforestation rates and reforestation needs between 1991 and 2023. It found that deforestation in California鈥檚 conifer-dominated forests increased exponentially over the study period, taking place primarily on USDA Forest Service and private lands. Meanwhile, reforestation efforts are not keeping pace with the losses.

Reforestation needs were minimal in the early 1990s, rose sharply in the early 2000s and surged after 2020. During that time, California lost between 6% and 11% of its conifer forests. Multiple big-fire years caused deforestation rates to rise to between 0.25% and 0.47% per year between 2001 and 2023. That is substantially higher than the global average of 0.15% per year. 

鈥淭hose rates are right up there with the world鈥檚 leaders in fire-driven forest loss, like Russia, Portugal, Greece, Bolivia and even Canada,鈥 said senior author , a forest and fire ecologist with the 麻豆传媒 Environmental Science and Policy department. 鈥淚n the case of California, the rate is also accelerating rapidly. A couple more big-fire years like 2020 or 2021, and we could be looking at large-scale loss of conifer forests over wide swaths of the state.鈥 

Burned forest with blackened trunks and fresh green regrowth under blue sky
Two years after 2021's Dixie Fire in Lassen County, charred remnants cast shadows over the forest as new growth emerges. (Kat Kerlin/麻豆传媒)

Estimating forest loss and growth

For the study, scientists combined remotely sensed fire severity data with a tool called POSCRPT (Postfire Spatial Conifer Regeneration Prediction Tool) that was developed by 麻豆传媒, UC Berkeley and the Forest Service. They were able to estimate how much forest was actually lost by incorporating both tree mortality and projected five-year postfire seedling densities. 

Forest restoration needs were assessed under scenarios of moderate, high and acute priority. Moderate scenarios incorporated only a tree mortality measure, while the other scenarios incorporated both tree mortality and the probability that seedlings will regenerate. 

The team found that on Forest Service lands only about 8% of high-priority areas and less than 3% of acute-priority areas were reforested during the entire study period. Between 2016 and 2023, only about 1% of deforested Forest Service lands were replanted. In contrast, on private industrial timberlands, more than 90% of severely burned lands were replanted.

Fire-driven reforestation needs

The state鈥檚 greatest reforestation needs are in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests and Northern California Douglas-fir forests, especially areas hit by the massive 2020 and 2021 wildfires: the northern Inner Coast Ranges, the northern Sierra Nevada鈥搒outhern Cascades, and the southwestern Sierra Nevada.

While middle-elevation forests experienced the greatest losses, high-elevation forests showed the fastest increases in deforestation.

Those rates are right up there with the world鈥檚 leaders in fire-driven forest loss." 鈥 Hugh Safford, 麻豆传媒

The paper noted that federal budgets and staffing for reforestation have been dropping for decades, even as drought, wildfire and pest outbreaks increase. This is in contrast to Canada, where similar trends have led to increases in budgets for reforestation science and management. Without sustained, substantial intervention, current restoration efforts will not be enough to prevent the long-term transformation of California鈥檚 forest ecosystems.

鈥淐alifornia has much more fire-driven forest loss than people understand,鈥 Safford said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 high even by international standards. It鈥檚 happening more in high-elevation, climate-sensitive areas that protect our watersheds, and there鈥檚 almost nothing being done about it. If commensurate actions aren鈥檛 taken soon, we鈥檙e going to lose huge areas of conifer forest and the ecosystem services those forests provide.鈥

The study is co-authored by Joseph A. E. Stewart, a 麻豆传媒 research ecologist. It was funded by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE).

Media Resources

for download.

Primary Category

Secondary Categories

Environment

Tags